“The era of procrastination, of half measures, of soothing and baffling expedients, of delays, is coming to its close. In its place we are entering a period of consequences.” – Winston Churchill, House of Commons debate on the Address, 12 November 1936
By early September, most business owners have already sat through the August numbers. Revenue is a little ahead of budget, or close enough not to matter. Margin has slipped by a fraction nobody’s worried about yet. Cash is manageable. The forecast, redrawn once more, still shows a year worth having, provided the last few months behave themselves. There are explanations for the weaker spots and perhaps a few things everyone would like to see improve, but nothing serious enough to demand a change of direction.
The numbers tell you how the year is going. They are strangely silent on whether it is going anywhere.
The half-year gets a proper pause: take stock, reset for what’s left. Year-end gets another: close the books, write the narrative, decide what next year needs to look like. Two-thirds of the way through gets nothing at all, and that’s worth noticing: it may be the last point in the year with enough runway left to change anything that still needs changing.
Explanations are easy enough to live with for one monthly meeting. Those explanations become more interesting after eight such meetings.
Enough Chances to Repeat
At three months, almost anything can be waved off. A slow quarter, an awkward customer, a delayed project, one uncomfortable margin call: the explanations are cheap, and mostly true. At six months, there’s still a comfortable assumption sitting underneath most conversations, that the second half will even things out the way it usually does.
By eight months, some of those explanations have started to wear thin. Not because the future has become any more predictable, but because the same kind of event has now had time to turn up more than once. The margin problem in August may involve a different customer from the one in April. The slipped deadline may be on another project. The person making the difficult decision may have changed. Each event remains different in its detail, but eight months provide enough distance to notice when the differences have started to matter less than the repetition.
That doesn’t make the future predictable. It simply makes coincidence a less comfortable explanation.
A Good Month Doesn’t Always Mean What It Looks Like
The year-to-date pack can be accurate, yet still not say much about what it took to achieve the results. It records revenue, not how many times a price had to be rescued to protect it. It records margin, not how much of it still depends on one relationship the business would struggle to replace tomorrow. What it doesn’t show at all is how much senior time has been spent during the year propping up something that was meant to be closed off back in March.
Two businesses, or two months in the same business, can land on almost identical numbers. One gets there through the ordinary course of trading. The other, closer to the pattern explored in Performance You Don’t Have to Push, only achieves a similar-looking result because someone kept having to step in to push it there. The pack doesn’t distinguish between the two, and there’s a fair argument that it isn’t supposed to. Its business is reporting what happened, not what it took to reach those results.
There’s a reason three good months in a row can feel like more reassurance than they’ve actually earned. Dan Lovallo and Daniel Kahneman wrote about something related in their Harvard Business Review article Delusions of Success: How Optimism Undermines Executives’ Decisions. Their subject was forecasting major initiatives, not reading eight months of management accounts, but they described the tendency of executives to take an “inside view”, giving considerable weight to the particulars of their own situation while underweighting less comforting evidence.
There is something recognisable in that. It is often easier to explain why August was unusual than to wonder why there have now been several unusual months.
The Problem That Keeps Coming Back
A late delivery gets logged as a sales problem in April. Somebody speaks to the customer, the account is smoothed over, and the file is closed. In June, a similar delay turns out to be a capacity problem: a different department, a different explanation, the same customer waiting rather longer than they should. By August, the story has become an approvals problem, with nobody quite able to sign off the exception fast enough to keep things moving. Three explanations, each with a different fix, and people from separate departments convinced their part of it was sorted.
Anything apparently solved three times has probably not been solved. It has simply been given three different reasons by three different people, none of whom saw the other two.
A capacity problem cleared by one intervention has a habit of reappearing somewhere else a few weeks later: as unplanned overtime, as a deadline that slips without an obvious cause, as a margin that softens by a percentage point nobody can quite account for. Something similar shows up in how decisions travel through a growing business once its structure stops being appropriate to its size. Whatever the pattern actually shows about this particular business is worth more attention than an August board meeting has time to give it, and probably belongs in a longer conversation than this one.
A Performance Review and a Position Review Are Different Conversations
The scene is familiar enough. A board or management team works through the agenda: revenue against plan, margin movement, cash, the two or three objectives running late, an updated forecast for the balance of the year. Everybody agrees the year remains broadly on track. The meeting closes on time.
Around the same table, over the same report, a different approach to the conversation was available and mostly wasn’t had. What’s actually become easier to run this year than it was in January? What still needs somebody senior to intervene before it moves? Which assumption made back then would the room still defend today, and which has stopped being true without anybody formally revisiting it? None of this shows up on the agenda, because none of it has a line item. It comes up, if it comes up at all, in the conversation after the formal business is done.
Neither conversation is wrong. The first is a performance review: did the numbers do roughly what we expected? The second is closer to a position review: given everything that’s happened, where does the business actually stand now? A business can pass the first comfortably and still be losing ground on the second. The more structured version of that question has its own treatment in The Quarterly Review: Course Correction or Carry On?, which isn’t the focus of this article.
Less Runway Than the Calendar Suggests
September still looks comfortable when you glance at a calendar. There’s a natural temptation to treat what’s left of the year as four clear months, minus whatever gets absorbed by the usual seasonal noise. In practice, much of that runway is already spoken for. Lead times on anything ordered now may not land before November, and a customer’s own decision cycle rarely compresses just because a supplier would find it convenient.
Recruitment, if it’s needed, takes longer than the vacancy notice suggests. December itself, in South Africa and plenty of comparable markets, is only partly a trading month once shutdowns, leave and the general slowdown around the festive period are allowed for.
What’s genuinely left is closer to three useful months, with part of a fourth not really available for anything new. That’s not a reason for alarm. It is, though, a reasonably firm answer to a question most businesses never quite ask out loud: whether the plan for the rest of the year is to execute the existing one harder, or to look again, briefly, at those assumptions that eight months of evidence has started to challenge.
Reading Before Resetting
The first eight months have produced results, and alongside them a fair amount of repetition, a few workarounds, one or two genuine surprises, and perhaps a handful of things that turned out easier than expected. Taken individually, most of it can be filed away as simply what happened this year. Taken together, eight months in, some of it starts to look like something worth reading and understanding better rather than just recording.
September will bring its own version of a reset, as it often does. Before that, though, there’s a smaller question worth thinking about more deeply, the kind that doesn’t come with an obvious answer attached: if the same thing has happened often enough to become part of the shape of the year, at what point does it stop being an exception?
If you enjoyed this article you can subscribe here to receive future articles.
—
0 Comments